Epicor Software Corporation
Employer · California, United States
- Employer address
- California, United States
- Applications on record
- 49
- FY2025 applications
- 0
- FY2026 to 30 June
- 0
- Programmes
- LCA · PERM
- Median offered wage
- $88,496
- Most common occupation
- Management Analysts
VE<USAEPICOR<SOFTWARE<CORPORATION<<<<<<<<<<< CA491<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<4
Applications year by year
Epicor Software Corporation appears in 49 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).
Applications by fiscal year — Epicor Software Corporation
Data table
| FY2008 | 8 |
| FY2009 | 3 |
| FY2010 | 5 |
| FY2011 | 11 |
| FY2012 | 9 |
| FY2013 | 5 |
| FY2014 | 7 |
| FY2015 | 1 |
| FY2016 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 0 |
| FY2026* | 0 |
| Fiscal year | LCA | PERM |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026* | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 7 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 4 | 1 |
| FY2012 | 9 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 11 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 4 | 1 |
| FY2009 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2008 | 7 | 1 |
Where the jobs are
Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).
Epicor Software Corporation: applications by worksite state
Data table
| State | Applications |
|---|---|
| MN | 14 |
| CA | 11 |
| IL | 5 |
| OH | 5 |
| CO | 5 |
| WA | 4 |
| PA | 3 |
| OR | 2 |
- Minneapolis, MN13
- Irvine, CA10
- Centennial, CO5
- Monroe, OH4
- Yardley, PA3
- Aurora, IL2
- Portland, OR2
- Mason, OH1
What they hire for and pay
Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.
- Senior Implementation Project Manager7
- Software Engineer4
- SR. Consultant, Management Analyst3
- QA Engineer3
- Sales Engineer, Technical Support3
- Consultant, Erp Software2
- Team Lead Custom Solutions2
- SR. Application Developer2
Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile
Median $88,496; middle half $81,800 to $91,784 · median prevailing wage $78,572 (marker) · 36 applications.
H-1B petitions decided by USCIS
Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.
Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)
Data table
| FY2009 | 1 |
| FY2010 | 1 |
| FY2011 | 5 |
| FY2012 | 3 |
| FY2013 | 4 |
| FY2014 | 3 |
| Fiscal year | Initial approvals | Initial denials | Continuing approvals | Continuing denials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| FY2010 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2009 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Records under the same legal name
Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.
| Record | State | Applications | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epicor Software Corporation | Texas | 56 | FY2014–FY2026 |
Among employers in California
Epicor Software Corporation has 49 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #3,601 of 30,712 sponsoring employers in California and #21,417 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.00% of the applications filed by employers based in California.
- Rank in California
- 3,601 of 30,712
- Rank in the United States
- 21,417 of 168,030
- Share of California's applications
- 0.00%
- Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in California
- 12,087
- Google LLC100,642
- HCL America, Inc.65,516
- Facebook, Inc.63,530
- Intel Corporation61,185
- Apple Inc.60,673
- Google Inc.34,245
- Cisco Systems, Inc.26,767
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.25,216
- UST Global Inc.25,160
- Linkedin Corporation17,398
Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more