VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd.

Employer · California, United States

Employer address
California, United States
Applications on record
993
FY2025 applications
0
FY2026 to 30 June
0
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Median offered wage
$98,000
Most common occupation
Computer Systems Analysts
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAARICENT<TECHNOLOGIES<HOLDINGS<LTD<<<<<
CA9935<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<4

Applications year by year

Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd. appears in 993 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).

Applications by fiscal year — Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd.

75149FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
75149FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY2008143
FY200940
FY201096
FY201143
FY20120
FY20130
FY20140
FY20150
FY20160
FY201799
FY2018131
FY2019121
FY2020115
FY2021149
FY202256
FY20230
FY20240
FY20250
FY2026*0
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*00
FY202500
FY202400
FY202300
FY2022848
FY202113316
FY20201087
FY201910615
FY201812110
FY2017972
FY201600
FY201500
FY201400
FY201300
FY201200
FY2011394
FY2010942
FY2009400
FY20081403
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd.: applications by worksite state

7+7+12+27+42+
7+7+12+27+42+
Data table
StateApplications
CA532
WA134
TX78
MA42
FL38
MD34
IL27
GA21
NC20
VA12
NJ10
OK9
CO7
MO7
OR7
Worksite states
  1. California532
  2. Washington134
  3. Texas78
  4. Massachusetts42
  5. Florida38
  6. Maryland34
  7. Illinois27
  8. Georgia21
  9. North Carolina20
  10. Virginia12
Worksite cities
  1. Santa Clara, CA216
  2. Palo Alto, CA183
  3. Redmond, WA96
  4. Austin, TX40
  5. Germantown, MD31
  6. San Jose, CA29
  7. Milpitas, CA26
  8. Tampa, FL26
  9. Bellevue, WA22
  10. Richardson, TX20
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Computer Systems Analysts358
  2. Software Developers274
  3. Electronics Engineers, Except Computer92
  4. Network and Computer Systems Administrators30
  5. Computer Occupations, All Other20
  6. Architectural and Engineering Managers12
  7. Sales Managers7
  8. Computer and Information Systems Managers6
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Computer Programmer Analyst227
  2. Technical Leader209
  3. Senior Technical Leader149
  4. Senior Software Engineer33
  5. Engineering Project Manager26
  6. Technical Leader - Hardware25
  7. Principal Systems Engineer24
  8. Senior Hardware Design Engineer18

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $98,000; middle half $76,768 to $113,110 · median prevailing wage $100,485 (marker) · 770 applications.

$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India106
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

69138FY2009FY2010FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022
69138FY2009FY2017FY2019FY2021FY2022
Data table
FY200918
FY201057
FY201772
FY201836
FY20190
FY2020138
FY202198
FY202217
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY202211160
FY2021611372
FY2020739654
FY20190100
FY2018100263
FY2017600120
FY2010400170
FY200931150
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Quarles & Brady LLP438
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Records under the same legal name

Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.

RecordStateApplicationsYears
Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd.New Jersey770FY2011–FY2019
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in California

Aricent Technologies (holdings) Ltd. has 993 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #229 of 30,712 sponsoring employers in California and #1,325 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.05% of the applications filed by employers based in California.

Rank in California
229 of 30,712
Rank in the United States
1,325 of 168,030
Share of California's applications
0.05%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in California
12,087
Largest sponsoring employers in California
  1. Google LLC100,642
  2. HCL America, Inc.65,516
  3. Facebook, Inc.63,530
  4. Intel Corporation61,185
  5. Apple Inc.60,673
  6. Google Inc.34,245
  7. Cisco Systems, Inc.26,767
  8. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.25,216
  9. UST Global Inc.25,160
  10. Linkedin Corporation17,398
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more