VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Thinc Systems, Inc

Employer · Michigan, United States

Employer address
Michigan, United States
Applications on record
553
FY2025 applications
0
FY2026 to 30 June
0
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Median offered wage
$63,378
Most common occupation
Computer Systems Analysts
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USATHINC<SYSTEMS<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
MI5537<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8

Applications year by year

Thinc Systems, Inc appears in 553 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).

Applications by fiscal year — Thinc Systems, Inc

4997FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
4997FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY20089
FY200914
FY201020
FY201197
FY201272
FY201344
FY201453
FY201553
FY201679
FY201739
FY201827
FY201920
FY202013
FY20218
FY20224
FY20231
FY20240
FY20250
FY2026*0
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*00
FY202500
FY202400
FY202301
FY202240
FY202180
FY2020130
FY2019191
FY2018270
FY2017381
FY2016763
FY2015476
FY2014530
FY2013377
FY20126210
FY20117819
FY2010173
FY2009122
FY200872
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Thinc Systems, Inc: applications by worksite state

9+10+13+25+40+
9+10+13+25+40+
Data table
StateApplications
MI161
TX48
CA47
IL40
NJ38
GA28
NC25
OK24
VA17
NY13
PA12
MD11
WI10
OH9
CT9
Worksite states
  1. Michigan161
  2. Texas48
  3. California47
  4. Illinois40
  5. New Jersey38
  6. Georgia28
  7. North Carolina25
  8. Oklahoma24
  9. Virginia17
  10. New York13
Worksite cities
  1. Farmington, MI63
  2. Farmington Hills, MI52
  3. Detroit, MI35
  4. Ardmore, OK24
  5. Sherman, TX17
  6. Charlotte, NC17
  7. Jersey City, NJ14
  8. Atlanta, GA13
  9. Bloomington, IL12
  10. New York City, NY10
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Computer Systems Analysts203
  2. Software Developers146
  3. Computer Programmers90
  4. Network and Computer Systems Administrators49
  5. Database Administrators17
  6. Computer Occupations, All Other15
  7. Computer and Information Systems Managers3
  8. Electronics Engineers, Except Computer2
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Programmer Analyst245
  2. Systems Analyst49
  3. Systems Administrator22
  4. Software Developer11
  5. Software Architect11
  6. Database Administrator10
  7. Senior Systems Analyst9
  8. Business Analyst9

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $63,378; middle half $60,000 to $73,000 · median prevailing wage $62,629 (marker) · 461 applications.

$40k$55k$70k$85k$100k
$40k$55k$70k$85k$100k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India55
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

1733FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
1733FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2023
Data table
FY20093
FY20103
FY201133
FY201223
FY201313
FY201424
FY201512
FY201615
FY201712
FY201811
FY20198
FY202013
FY20214
FY20224
FY20231
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20230010
FY20221030
FY20210040
FY202000131
FY20190082
FY2018041110
FY201728102
FY201610143
FY201505124
FY201474173
FY20134194
FY2012130104
FY2011122210
FY20100030
FY20093100
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Law Offices of Amarnath Gowda12
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Records under the same legal name

Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.

RecordStateApplicationsYears
Thinc Systems, IncGeorgia64FY2008–FY2010
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Michigan

Thinc Systems, Inc has 553 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #119 of 4,481 sponsoring employers in Michigan and #2,581 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.15% of the applications filed by employers based in Michigan.

Rank in Michigan
119 of 4,481
Rank in the United States
2,581 of 168,030
Share of Michigan's applications
0.15%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in Michigan
1,667
Largest sponsoring employers in Michigan
  1. HCL Global Systems Inc11,421
  2. University of Michigan11,411
  3. HTC Global Services Inc.9,897
  4. General Motors Company9,171
  5. Syntel Inc9,137
  6. Populus Group LLC8,126
  7. Syntel Consulting Inc.8,010
  8. Ford Motor Company7,298
  9. Atos Syntel Inc6,722
  10. Reliable Software Resources, Inc.5,413
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more