VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Scepter Technologies Inc

Employer · Maryland, United States

Employer address
Maryland, United States
Applications on record
1,345
FY2025 applications
22
FY2026 to 30 June
7
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
98.7%
Median offered wage
$105,643
Most common occupation
Software Developers
H-1B dependent (as declared)
Yes
Certified98.7%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USASCEPTER<TECHNOLOGIES<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
MD13452<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8

Applications year by year

Scepter Technologies Inc appears in 1,345 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 22.

Applications by fiscal year — Scepter Technologies Inc

97194FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
97194FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY200839
FY200914
FY201017
FY201135
FY201268
FY201392
FY2014160
FY2015148
FY2016194
FY2017156
FY2018143
FY201996
FY202052
FY202128
FY202228
FY202330
FY202416
FY202522
FY2026*7
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*70
FY2025193
FY2024151
FY20232010
FY2022226
FY2021280
FY2020502
FY2019915
FY201812716
FY201714115
FY201616331
FY20151399
FY20141519
FY2013911
FY2012653
FY20112411
FY2010143
FY2009131
FY2008390
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Scepter Technologies Inc: applications by worksite state

25+27+39+46+66+
25+27+39+46+66+
Data table
StateApplications
MD373
TX106
CA103
IL66
NY62
MN50
PA46
NJ45
NC43
FL39
VA34
AZ29
DC27
GA26
WI25
Worksite states
  1. Maryland373
  2. Texas106
  3. California103
  4. Illinois66
  5. New York62
  6. Minnesota50
  7. Pennsylvania46
  8. New Jersey45
  9. North Carolina43
  10. Florida39
Worksite cities
  1. Owings Mills, MD200
  2. Columbia, MD75
  3. Silver Spring, MD40
  4. Washington, DC27
  5. Austin, TX24
  6. Phoenix, AZ24
  7. Minneapolis, MN22
  8. Chicago, IL21
  9. Charlotte, NC20
  10. Atlanta, GA19
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Software Developers503
  2. Computer Programmers459
  3. Computer Systems Analysts221
  4. Network and Computer Systems Administrators73
  5. Computer and Information Systems Managers26
  6. Computer Occupations, All Other4
  7. Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers1
  8. Computer Network Architects1
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Programmer Analyst504
  2. Software Engineer222
  3. Systems Analyst209
  4. SR. Software Engineer161
  5. Systems Administrator33
  6. IT Manager21
  7. SR. Programmer Analyst20
  8. SR. Systems Analyst19

Offered annual wage, FY2024–FY2026, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $105,643; middle half $97,292 to $113,641 · median prevailing wage $102,482 (marker) · 38 applications.

$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
Prevailing wage level
  1. Level II40
  2. Level III1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India117
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

3467FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
3467FY2009FY2012FY2017FY2020FY2023
Data table
FY20096
FY20105
FY201113
FY201222
FY201458
FY201667
FY201754
FY201858
FY201949
FY202054
FY202127
FY202221
FY20237
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20231060
FY202210200
FY202140231
FY2020163386
FY2019854114
FY201811124717
FY2017812465
FY2016195483
FY2014274310
FY201216261
FY20114190
FY20101041
FY20091051
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. BBI Law Group, P.C.29
  2. Simin H. Syed, P.C.3
  3. Kodem Law Firm PLLC2
  4. Scheef & Stone, LLP1
  5. Capitol Immigration Law Group PLLC1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Maryland

Scepter Technologies Inc has 1,345 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #16 of 3,417 sponsoring employers in Maryland and #914 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.40% of the applications filed by employers based in Maryland.

Rank in Maryland
16 of 3,417
Rank in the United States
914 of 168,030
Share of Maryland's applications
0.40%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in Maryland
1,496
Largest sponsoring employers in Maryland
  1. Tata Consultancy Services Limited180,382
  2. University of Maryland College Park7,823
  3. Johns Hopkins University7,496
  4. National Institutes of Health, HHS5,863
  5. Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.4,477
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute3,190
  7. Baltimore City Public School System3,108
  8. Government Employees Insurance Company2,882
  9. Hughes Network Systems LLC2,532
  10. Prince George's County Public Schools2,004
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more