VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Quality Matrix Inc

Employer · Massachusetts, United States

Employer address
Massachusetts, United States
Applications on record
1,942
FY2025 applications
16
FY2026 to 30 June
23
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
100.0%
Median offered wage
$105,612
Most common occupation
Computer Systems Analysts
H-1B dependent (as declared)
Yes
Certified100.0%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAQUALITY<MATRIX<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
MA19422<FY20098<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<2

Applications year by year

Quality Matrix Inc appears in 1,942 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 16.

Applications by fiscal year — Quality Matrix Inc

135269FY2009FY2011FY2013FY2015FY2017FY2019FY2021FY2023FY2025FY2026*
135269FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY200912
FY20107
FY201126
FY2012149
FY2013159
FY2014220
FY2015229
FY2016210
FY2017213
FY2018269
FY2019116
FY202097
FY202193
FY202235
FY202332
FY202436
FY202516
FY2026*23
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*212
FY2025160
FY2024342
FY2023302
FY2022314
FY2021849
FY2020925
FY20191142
FY201825316
FY201719221
FY201619713
FY201521316
FY201419525
FY201313722
FY201212722
FY2011260
FY201070
FY2009120
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Quality Matrix Inc: applications by worksite state

50+58+60+75+117+
50+58+60+75+117+
Data table
StateApplications
MA486
TX151
NY123
CA117
PA106
MD82
NJ75
FL60
ME60
IL60
GA60
MN59
NH58
VA57
MI50
Worksite states
  1. Massachusetts486
  2. Texas151
  3. New York123
  4. California117
  5. Pennsylvania106
  6. Maryland82
  7. New Jersey75
  8. Florida60
  9. Maine60
  10. Illinois60
Worksite cities
  1. Westborough, MA364
  2. Merrimack, NH51
  3. South Portland, ME48
  4. Washington, DC24
  5. Allentown, PA24
  6. Buffalo, NY24
  7. Charlotte, NC22
  8. Atlanta, GA21
  9. Quincy, MA20
  10. Chicago, IL19
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Computer Systems Analysts640
  2. Software Developers591
  3. Computer Occupations, All Other226
  4. Computer Programmers172
  5. Computer and Information Systems Managers18
  6. Database Administrators11
  7. Information Security Analysts10
  8. Engineers, All Other7
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Quality Assurance Analyst and Tester254
  2. QA Analyst94
  3. Software Quality Assurance Analyst and Tester63
  4. QA Analyst and Tester50
  5. QA Analyst / Developer38
  6. Software Quality Assurance Engineers and Testers35
  7. Software Developer33
  8. Quality Assurance Analyst29

Offered annual wage, FY2024–FY2026, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $105,612; middle half $92,695 to $112,642 · median prevailing wage $105,227 (marker) · 70 applications.

$80k$90k$100k$110k$120k
$80k$90k$100k$110k$120k
Prevailing wage level
  1. Level II69
  2. Level III2
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India158
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

5099FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
5099FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2023
Data table
FY20097
FY20103
FY201116
FY201276
FY201345
FY201458
FY201581
FY201699
FY201778
FY201879
FY201946
FY202062
FY202174
FY202229
FY20239
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20231080
FY202230261
FY202140708
FY202031599
FY2019684018
FY201812116734
FY2017107717
FY2016949020
FY20151346811
FY2014187409
FY201392361
FY2012404360
FY201140120
FY20100030
FY20090271
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Ramineni & Shepard, LLC138
  2. Law Office of Keshab Raj Seadie, P.C.92
  3. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP9
  4. Murthy Law Firm4
  5. Ramineni Law Associates, LLC1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Massachusetts

Quality Matrix Inc has 1,942 work visa applications on record (FY2009–FY2026), ranking #36 of 6,297 sponsoring employers in Massachusetts and #572 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.45% of the applications filed by employers based in Massachusetts.

Rank in Massachusetts
36 of 6,297
Rank in the United States
572 of 168,030
Share of Massachusetts's applications
0.45%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in Massachusetts
2,667
Largest sponsoring employers in Massachusetts
  1. Virtusa Corporation13,005
  2. Randstad Technologies, LLC11,730
  3. Fidelity Technology Group, LLC11,656
  4. Patni Americas Inc.10,160
  5. NTT Data, Inc.9,000
  6. The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.8,475
  7. The Mathworks, Inc.8,037
  8. Emc Corporation6,787
  9. Avco Consulting Inc6,325
  10. Harvard University6,206
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more