VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Prolifics, Inc.

Employer · New York, United States

Employer address
New York, United States
Applications on record
503
FY2025 applications
0
FY2026 to 30 June
0
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Median offered wage
$100,000
Most common occupation
Software Developers
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAPROLIFICS<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
NY5037<FY20135<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8

Applications year by year

Prolifics, Inc. appears in 503 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).

Applications by fiscal year — Prolifics, Inc.

70139FY2013FY2015FY2017FY2019FY2021FY2023FY2025FY2026*
70139FY2013FY2016FY2019FY2022FY2025FY2026*
Data table
FY201326
FY2014109
FY2015108
FY2016139
FY2017120
FY20181
FY20190
FY20200
FY20210
FY20220
FY20230
FY20240
FY20250
FY2026*0
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*00
FY202500
FY202400
FY202300
FY202200
FY202100
FY202000
FY201900
FY201810
FY20171200
FY201612613
FY20159711
FY20141063
FY2013260
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Prolifics, Inc.: applications by worksite state

6+8+15+24+42+
6+8+15+24+42+
Data table
StateApplications
NY114
CA92
TN45
CT42
NJ34
MA25
TX24
NC19
RI17
MO15
OH13
PA10
FL8
GA6
WA6
Worksite states
  1. New York114
  2. California92
  3. Tennessee45
  4. Connecticut42
  5. New Jersey34
  6. Massachusetts25
  7. Texas24
  8. North Carolina19
  9. Rhode Island17
  10. Missouri15
Worksite cities
  1. New York City, NY80
  2. Nashville, TN36
  3. San Francisco, CA26
  4. Pleasanton, CA24
  5. Hartford, CT16
  6. O'Fallon, MO15
  7. Buffalo, NY14
  8. Jersey City, NJ12
  9. Westbury, NY12
  10. Irving, TX10
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Software Developers419
  2. Computer Occupations, All Other65
  3. Computer Systems Analysts10
  4. Computer Programmers5
  5. Chief Executives1
  6. Network and Computer Systems Administrators1
  7. Computer and Information Systems Managers1
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Senior Consultant121
  2. Associate Consultant95
  3. Consultant61
  4. Technical Lead44
  5. Solution Architect41
  6. Senior Software Engineer23
  7. Tech Lead14
  8. Software Engineer11

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $100,000; middle half $75,361 to $115,000 · median prevailing wage $80,932 (marker) · 450 applications.

$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

4284FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018
4284FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018
Data table
FY201538
FY201657
FY201784
FY201812
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY201811310
FY2017152691
FY201630540
FY2015100280
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter11
  2. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo10
  3. Mintz2
  4. Law Office of Jessie Ho1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Records under the same legal name

Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.

RecordStateApplicationsYears
Prolifics, Inc.Florida269FY2019–FY2026
Prolifics, Inc.California267FY2017–FY2019
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in New York

Prolifics, Inc. has 503 work visa applications on record (FY2013–FY2026), ranking #211 of 20,040 sponsoring employers in New York and #2,860 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.06% of the applications filed by employers based in New York.

Rank in New York
211 of 20,040
Rank in the United States
2,860 of 168,030
Share of New York's applications
0.06%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in New York
6,734
Largest sponsoring employers in New York
  1. Mphasis Corporation23,023
  2. Citibank, N.A.13,841
  3. Bloomberg, LP11,301
  4. Capgemini America Inc10,803
  5. Mckinsey & Company, Inc.9,130
  6. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.8,898
  7. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC8,031
  8. Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.7,703
  9. Synechron, Inc.7,561
  10. Goldman, Sachs & Co.7,217
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Same legal name in other countries

Records in other countries' official lists that carry exactly this legal name. They are linked, not merged: no shared official identifier shows that they are the same organisation, and a group's companies in different countries are often separate legal entities.

CountryRecordOfficial list
United KingdomProlifics IncRegister of licensed sponsors
Source: Visa Atlas, exact legal-name match between the U.S. Department of Labor disclosure data, the UK Home Office register of licensed sponsors and the ESDC list of LMIA employersData as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more