VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Pacific Life Lines, Inc.

Employer · California, United States

Employer address
California, United States
Applications on record
6
FY2025 applications
1
FY2026 to 30 June
1
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
100.0%
Median offered wage
$104,062
Most common occupation
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Workers, All Other
H-1B dependent (as declared)
No
Certified100.0%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAPACIFIC<LIFE<LINES<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
CA60<FY20227<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8

Applications year by year

Pacific Life Lines, Inc. appears in 6 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 1.

Applications by fiscal year — Pacific Life Lines, Inc.

12FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026*
12FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026*
Data table
FY20221
FY20232
FY20241
FY20251
FY2026*1
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*01
FY202510
FY202410
FY202320
FY202210
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Pacific Life Lines, Inc.: applications by worksite state

6+6+6+6+6+
6+6+6+6+6+
Data table
StateApplications
CA6
Worksite states
  1. California6
Worksite cities
  1. Redwood City, CA5
  2. San Carlos, CA1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Workers, All Other5
  2. Health Technologists and Technicians, All Other1
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Clinical Staff Perfusionist4
  2. Perfusionist1

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $104,062; middle half $104,062 to $104,062 · median prevailing wage $104,062 (marker) · 5 applications.

$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

11FY2023
11FY2023
Data table
FY20231
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20231000
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Mccown & Evans LLP6
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in California

Pacific Life Lines, Inc. has 6 work visa applications on record (FY2022–FY2026), ranking #22,062 of 30,712 sponsoring employers in California and #121,974 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.00% of the applications filed by employers based in California.

Rank in California
22,062 of 30,712
Rank in the United States
121,974 of 168,030
Share of California's applications
0.00%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 621) in California
1,018
Largest sponsoring employers in California
  1. Google LLC100,642
  2. HCL America, Inc.65,516
  3. Facebook, Inc.63,530
  4. Intel Corporation61,185
  5. Apple Inc.60,673
  6. Google Inc.34,245
  7. Cisco Systems, Inc.26,767
  8. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.25,216
  9. UST Global Inc.25,160
  10. Linkedin Corporation17,398
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more