VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Kaplan, Inc.

Employer · New York, United States

Employer address
New York, United States
Applications on record
260
FY2025 applications
0
FY2026 to 30 June
0
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Median offered wage
$100,000
Most common occupation
Software Developers
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAKAPLAN<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
NY2607<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<8

Applications year by year

Kaplan, Inc. appears in 260 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).

Applications by fiscal year — Kaplan, Inc.

2345FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
2345FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY200811
FY200916
FY201016
FY20118
FY201210
FY201310
FY201410
FY201520
FY201632
FY201720
FY201838
FY201924
FY202045
FY20210
FY20220
FY20230
FY20240
FY20250
FY2026*0
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*00
FY202500
FY202400
FY202300
FY202200
FY202100
FY2020405
FY2019213
FY20182711
FY2017173
FY2016257
FY2015182
FY201446
FY201382
FY201237
FY201153
FY2010106
FY2009124
FY200883
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Kaplan, Inc.: applications by worksite state

1+1+1+2+7+
1+1+1+2+7+
Data table
StateApplications
NY233
CA10
FL7
NV2
VA2
IN1
NC1
IL1
NH1
MA1
KS1
Worksite states
  1. New York233
  2. California10
  3. Florida7
  4. Nevada2
  5. Virginia2
  6. Indiana1
  7. North Carolina1
  8. Illinois1
  9. New Hampshire1
  10. Massachusetts1
Worksite cities
  1. New York City, NY210
  2. Los Angeles, CA5
  3. Fort Lauderdale, FL4
  4. Seal Beach, CA3
  5. Hollywood, FL3
  6. Whittier, CA2
  7. Arlington, VA2
  8. Reno, NV2
  9. Aurora, IL1
  10. Manchester, NH1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Software Developers163
  2. Computer Systems Analysts15
  3. Computer and Information Systems Managers14
  4. Computer Occupations, All Other9
  5. Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists9
  6. Instructional Coordinators4
  7. Art Directors3
  8. Computer Programmers3
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Software Engineer21
  2. Senior Software Engineer14
  3. Data Analytics Engineer13
  4. QA Automation Engineer10
  5. Senior Developer8
  6. Senior Java Developer5
  7. Engineering Manager in Development5
  8. Senior Data Modeler4

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $100,000; middle half $85,000 to $120,000 · median prevailing wage $93,870 (marker) · 184 applications.

$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
$60k$80k$100k$120k$140k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India45
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

1836FY2009FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021
1836FY2009FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2021
Data table
FY20091
FY201115
FY20121
FY201315
FY201415
FY20153
FY201613
FY201715
FY201818
FY201912
FY202036
FY20212
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20212000
FY202010350
FY201920101
FY201830150
FY201710141
FY20164390
FY20151020
FY201430120
FY201320130
FY20120010
FY20116090
FY20091000
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Barst Mukamal & Kleiner LLP69
  2. Barst Mukamal & Kleiner8
  3. Franczek P.C.6
  4. Barnes & Thornburg LLP6
  5. Franczek Radelet P.C.2
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Records under the same legal name

Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.

RecordStateApplicationsYears
Kaplan, Inc.Florida32FY2010–FY2024
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in New York

Kaplan, Inc. has 260 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #382 of 20,040 sponsoring employers in New York and #5,388 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.03% of the applications filed by employers based in New York.

Rank in New York
382 of 20,040
Rank in the United States
5,388 of 168,030
Share of New York's applications
0.03%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 611) in New York
761
Largest sponsoring employers in New York
  1. Mphasis Corporation23,023
  2. Citibank, N.A.13,841
  3. Bloomberg, LP11,301
  4. Capgemini America Inc10,803
  5. Mckinsey & Company, Inc.9,130
  6. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.8,898
  7. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC8,031
  8. Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.7,703
  9. Synechron, Inc.7,561
  10. Goldman, Sachs & Co.7,217
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more