VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Jean Martin Inc

Employer · New York, United States

Employer address
New York, United States
Applications on record
1,406
FY2025 applications
46
FY2026 to 30 June
31
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
100.0%
Median offered wage
$106,558
Most common occupation
Computer Occupations, All Other
H-1B dependent (as declared)
Yes
Certified100.0%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAJEAN<MARTIN<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
NY14068<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<6

Applications year by year

Jean Martin Inc appears in 1,406 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 46.

Applications by fiscal year — Jean Martin Inc

75150FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
75150FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY200870
FY200947
FY201067
FY2011112
FY201269
FY2013107
FY2014137
FY2015117
FY2016150
FY2017104
FY201842
FY201971
FY202043
FY202162
FY202245
FY202356
FY202430
FY202546
FY2026*31
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*310
FY2025424
FY2024291
FY2023542
FY2022441
FY2021557
FY2020430
FY20195813
FY2018420
FY20171022
FY201612426
FY20151143
FY201412710
FY2013989
FY20125910
FY20111066
FY2010634
FY2009470
FY2008646
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Jean Martin Inc: applications by worksite state

10+14+22+38+60+
10+14+22+38+60+
Data table
StateApplications
NY683
NJ225
CA78
CT60
TX46
OH40
GA38
WA30
NC27
VA22
MA20
TN16
MD14
AZ10
FL10
Worksite states
  1. New York683
  2. New Jersey225
  3. California78
  4. Connecticut60
  5. Texas46
  6. Ohio40
  7. Georgia38
  8. Washington30
  9. North Carolina27
  10. Virginia22
Worksite cities
  1. New York City, NY624
  2. Jersey City, NJ58
  3. North Bergen, NJ53
  4. Atlanta, GA25
  5. Shelton, CT22
  6. Rockaway, NJ21
  7. Columbus, OH21
  8. Stratford, CT21
  9. Brooklyn, NY19
  10. Charlotte, NC18
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Computer Occupations, All Other558
  2. Software Developers375
  3. Computer Programmers53
  4. Computer Systems Analysts39
  5. Web Developers35
  6. Database Administrators24
  7. Information Security Analysts22
  8. Computer and Information Systems Managers16
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Computer Specialist628
  2. Software Developer313
  3. Programmer Analyst138
  4. Information Security Analyst23
  5. Computer Programmer20
  6. Computer Specialists, All Other17
  7. Project Manager14
  8. Software Programmer13

Offered annual wage, FY2024–FY2026, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $106,558; middle half $97,115 to $119,496 · median prevailing wage $106,558 (marker) · 101 applications.

$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
$80k$95k$110k$125k$140k
Prevailing wage level
  1. Level I16
  2. Level II80
  3. Level III4
  4. Level IV2
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India95
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

3467FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
3467FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2023
Data table
FY200913
FY201012
FY201154
FY201229
FY201341
FY201467
FY201516
FY201635
FY201750
FY201814
FY201922
FY202028
FY202130
FY202215
FY202314
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20239050
FY20226091
FY202182224
FY202091191
FY201951170
FY201821125
FY2017114918
FY20161313220
FY201541121
FY2014491180
FY2013290120
FY2012160130
FY2011341200
FY20104081
FY200931101
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Law Offices of Prashanthi Reddy, PLLC52
  2. Law Office of Keshab Raj Seadie, P.C.5
  3. Law Offices Of Prashanthi Reddy2
  4. Ralph Ehrenpreis, PLC1
  5. Murthy Law Firm1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in New York

Jean Martin Inc has 1,406 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #66 of 20,040 sponsoring employers in New York and #870 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.17% of the applications filed by employers based in New York.

Rank in New York
66 of 20,040
Rank in the United States
870 of 168,030
Share of New York's applications
0.17%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in New York
6,734
Largest sponsoring employers in New York
  1. Mphasis Corporation23,023
  2. Citibank, N.A.13,841
  3. Bloomberg, LP11,301
  4. Capgemini America Inc10,803
  5. Mckinsey & Company, Inc.9,130
  6. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.8,898
  7. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC8,031
  8. Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc.7,703
  9. Synechron, Inc.7,561
  10. Goldman, Sachs & Co.7,217
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more