VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Harward Technologies LLC

Employer · Illinois, United States

Employer address
Illinois, United States
Applications on record
269
FY2025 applications
12
FY2026 to 30 June
5
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
100.0%
Median offered wage
$117,312
Most common occupation
Software Developers
H-1B dependent (as declared)
Yes
Certified100.0%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAHARWARD<TECHNOLOGIES<LLC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
IL2690<FY20102<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<4

Applications year by year

Harward Technologies LLC appears in 269 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 12.

Applications by fiscal year — Harward Technologies LLC

1835FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
1835FY2010FY2013FY2016FY2019FY2022FY2025FY2026*
Data table
FY20105
FY201117
FY201213
FY201315
FY201416
FY201520
FY201622
FY201726
FY201835
FY201922
FY202017
FY20217
FY202215
FY202313
FY20249
FY202512
FY2026*5
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*32
FY2025120
FY202463
FY2023103
FY2022132
FY202161
FY2020152
FY2019211
FY20182510
FY2017233
FY2016184
FY2015164
FY2014160
FY2013141
FY201294
FY2011152
FY201050
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Harward Technologies LLC: applications by worksite state

2+3+8+13+25+
2+3+8+13+25+
Data table
StateApplications
IL83
CA38
KS27
OH25
TX22
MN14
PA13
NC9
CO8
SC8
WA4
TN4
NJ3
MO3
WI2
Worksite states
  1. Illinois83
  2. California38
  3. Kansas27
  4. Ohio25
  5. Texas22
  6. Minnesota14
  7. Pennsylvania13
  8. North Carolina9
  9. Colorado8
  10. South Carolina8
Worksite cities
  1. Hampshire, IL43
  2. Los Angeles, CA22
  3. Mason, OH20
  4. Wichita, KS18
  5. Chicago, IL16
  6. Houston, TX12
  7. Lenexa, KS7
  8. St. Charles, IL6
  9. Charlotte, NC6
  10. San Ramon, CA5
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Software Developers213
  2. Computer Programmers21
  3. Computer Systems Analysts19
  4. Computer Network Architects7
  5. Management Analysts4
  6. Computer Occupations, All Other3
  7. Database Architects2
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Software Engineer99
  2. PLM Solution Architect25
  3. Programmer Analyst17
  4. Enovia Solution Architect17
  5. Systems Analyst15
  6. PLM Systems Architect5
  7. PLM Engineering Applications Specialist4
  8. Enovia Architect4

Offered annual wage, FY2024–FY2026, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $117,312; middle half $110,000 to $129,667 · median prevailing wage $106,517 (marker) · 21 applications.

$100k$110k$120k$130k$140k
$100k$110k$120k$130k$140k
Prevailing wage level
  1. Level II15
  2. Level III6
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

816FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
816FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2023
Data table
FY20091
FY20101
FY20118
FY20126
FY20136
FY20148
FY20156
FY20168
FY201716
FY20189
FY20198
FY202015
FY20215
FY20226
FY20236
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20231050
FY20221050
FY20211041
FY202010140
FY20190083
FY20180292
FY201700160
FY20160080
FY20153030
FY20142060
FY20131050
FY20120060
FY20113050
FY20100011
FY20091000
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Greenspoon Marder LLP52
  2. Law Offices of Mary Kennedy, LLC27
  3. Nair Law Group, A Professional Corporation15
  4. Joseph Kallabat & Associates, P.C.10
  5. International Legal and Business Services Group LLP4
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Records under the same legal name

Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.

RecordStateApplicationsYears
Harward Technologies LLCWisconsin6FY2009–FY2010
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Illinois

Harward Technologies LLC has 269 work visa applications on record (FY2010–FY2026), ranking #272 of 7,029 sponsoring employers in Illinois and #5,216 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.04% of the applications filed by employers based in Illinois.

Rank in Illinois
272 of 7,029
Rank in the United States
5,216 of 168,030
Share of Illinois's applications
0.04%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in Illinois
2,737
Largest sponsoring employers in Illinois
  1. Accenture LLP80,805
  2. Capgemini America Inc60,859
  3. JPMORGAN Chase & Co.45,147
  4. University of Illinois7,712
  5. Capgemini Financial Services USA Inc7,300
  6. Yash Technologies, Inc.5,426
  7. Northwestern University5,294
  8. The University of Chicago5,250
  9. Caterpillar Inc.5,182
  10. Capgemini U.S. LLC5,047
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more