VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

Corporate Computer Services Inc

Employer · Michigan, United States

Employer address
Michigan, United States
Applications on record
1,537
FY2025 applications
12
FY2026 to 30 June
11
Programmes
LCA · PERM
Certified (last three years)
100.0%
Median offered wage
$106,000
Most common occupation
Computer Programmers
H-1B dependent (as declared)
Yes
Certified100.0%of decided applications, last three years
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USACORPORATE<COMPUTER<SERVICES<INC<<<<<<<
MI15370<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<2

Applications year by year

Corporate Computer Services Inc appears in 1,537 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June). In fiscal 2025 it filed 12.

Applications by fiscal year — Corporate Computer Services Inc

76151FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
76151FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY2008131
FY2009151
FY2010140
FY2011140
FY2012107
FY2013120
FY2014137
FY2015146
FY2016101
FY201771
FY201864
FY201963
FY202057
FY202132
FY202225
FY202321
FY20248
FY202512
FY2026*11
Fiscal yearLCAPERM
FY2026*101
FY2025111
FY202480
FY2023210
FY2022241
FY2021302
FY2020543
FY2019630
FY2018604
FY2017638
FY20167922
FY201511828
FY201411423
FY20139525
FY20127235
FY20119149
FY20109545
FY20091483
FY20081229
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

Corporate Computer Services Inc: applications by worksite state

21+26+45+50+79+
21+26+45+50+79+
Data table
StateApplications
MI531
CA158
TX128
IL79
NC56
FL53
VA50
NY47
GA47
PA45
IA30
NJ30
WA26
OH21
MD21
Worksite states
  1. Michigan531
  2. California158
  3. Texas128
  4. Illinois79
  5. North Carolina56
  6. Florida53
  7. Virginia50
  8. New York47
  9. Georgia47
  10. Pennsylvania45
Worksite cities
  1. Farmington Hills, MI452
  2. Austin, TX33
  3. Richmond, VA25
  4. Atlanta, GA24
  5. San Jose, CA20
  6. Houston, TX20
  7. Charlotte, NC18
  8. New York City, NY17
  9. Irving, TX16
  10. Chicago, IL15
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Occupations (SOC 2018)
  1. Computer Programmers609
  2. Software Developers421
  3. Computer Systems Analysts154
  4. Database Administrators29
  5. Network and Computer Systems Administrators21
  6. Computer Occupations, All Other9
  7. Management Analysts6
  8. Mechanical Engineers5
Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Programmer Analyst705
  2. Software Developer130
  3. Computer Systems Analyst78
  4. Software Engineer55
  5. Software Developer/engineer28
  6. Systems Analyst24
  7. Software Developers20
  8. Computer Programmers16

Offered annual wage, FY2024–FY2026, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $106,000; middle half $95,000 to $110,000 · median prevailing wage $105,227 (marker) · 29 applications.

$80k$90k$100k$110k$120k
$80k$90k$100k$110k$120k
Prevailing wage level
  1. Level II27
  2. Level III2
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Green card sponsorship (PERM)

Country of citizenship of the workers named in certified and pending PERM applications (countries with fewer than five applications are not shown).

PERM applications by country of citizenship
  1. India247
  2. Pakistan7
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OFLC — PERM disclosure dataData as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

3161FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023
3161FY2009FY2012FY2015FY2018FY2021FY2023
Data table
FY200937
FY201048
FY201161
FY201234
FY201329
FY201459
FY201552
FY201660
FY201743
FY201829
FY201938
FY202043
FY202121
FY202213
FY20237
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY20230070
FY202200130
FY202110202
FY202010425
FY201921365
FY201800294
FY201700431
FY201622583
FY2015132392
FY2014182413
FY201381210
FY201270271
FY2011111502
FY2010724110
FY2009233510
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Law firms on the filings

Firms named as the employer's representative (firm names only).

Applications by law firm
  1. Dehai Tao P.C.60
  2. International Legal and Business Services Group LLP8
  3. Clement & Hurst, PLC8
  4. Dehai Tao Immigration PLLC2
  5. Madan & Saigal, LLC1
  6. Murthy Law Firm1
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Michigan

Corporate Computer Services Inc has 1,537 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #35 of 4,481 sponsoring employers in Michigan and #765 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.40% of the applications filed by employers based in Michigan.

Rank in Michigan
35 of 4,481
Rank in the United States
765 of 168,030
Share of Michigan's applications
0.40%
Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in Michigan
1,667
Largest sponsoring employers in Michigan
  1. HCL Global Systems Inc11,421
  2. University of Michigan11,411
  3. HTC Global Services Inc.9,897
  4. General Motors Company9,171
  5. Syntel Inc9,137
  6. Populus Group LLC8,126
  7. Syntel Consulting Inc.8,010
  8. Ford Motor Company7,298
  9. Atos Syntel Inc6,722
  10. Reliable Software Resources, Inc.5,413
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more