Chateck, Inc.
Employer · California, United States
- Employer address
- California, United States
- Applications on record
- 146
- FY2025 applications
- 0
- FY2026 to 30 June
- 0
- Programmes
- LCA · PERM
- Median offered wage
- $60,000
- Most common occupation
- Computer Systems Analysts
VE<USACHATECK<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< CA1461<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<6
Applications year by year
Chateck, Inc. appears in 146 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).
Applications by fiscal year — Chateck, Inc.
Data table
| FY2008 | 44 |
| FY2009 | 19 |
| FY2010 | 21 |
| FY2011 | 21 |
| FY2012 | 14 |
| FY2013 | 22 |
| FY2014 | 2 |
| FY2015 | 3 |
| FY2016 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 0 |
| FY2026* | 0 |
| Fiscal year | LCA | PERM |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026* | 0 | 0 |
| FY2025 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2024 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2023 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2022 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2021 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2020 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2019 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2018 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2017 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2016 | 0 | 0 |
| FY2015 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2014 | 2 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 22 | 0 |
| FY2012 | 14 | 0 |
| FY2011 | 18 | 3 |
| FY2010 | 16 | 5 |
| FY2009 | 18 | 1 |
| FY2008 | 44 | 0 |
Where the jobs are
Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).
Chateck, Inc.: applications by worksite state
Data table
| State | Applications |
|---|---|
| CA | 81 |
| WA | 32 |
| VA | 7 |
| IL | 6 |
| TX | 4 |
| FL | 4 |
| AZ | 3 |
| OR | 3 |
| TN | 2 |
| NJ | 1 |
| PA | 1 |
| NY | 1 |
| OH | 1 |
- Santa Clara, CA59
- Bellevue, WA14
- Seattle, WA8
- Reston, VA6
- Kent, WA5
- Hoffman Estates, IL5
- Redmond, WA5
- Sunnyvale, CA4
- Bellevue, CA4
- Lakeland, FL3
What they hire for and pay
Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.
- Computer Systems Analyst54
- Programmer Analyst50
- Software Engineer9
- Systems Analysis and Programming6
- Systems Analyst5
- Operations Engineer4
- Computer Systems Analysts3
- Systems Aaalyst1
Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile
Median $60,000; middle half $60,000 to $64,000 · median prevailing wage $60,174 (marker) · 111 applications.
H-1B petitions decided by USCIS
Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.
Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)
Data table
| FY2009 | 5 |
| FY2010 | 1 |
| FY2011 | 11 |
| FY2012 | 8 |
| FY2013 | 6 |
| FY2014 | 6 |
| Fiscal year | Initial approvals | Initial denials | Continuing approvals | Continuing denials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2014 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| FY2013 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| FY2012 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| FY2011 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 1 |
| FY2010 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| FY2009 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Records under the same legal name
Other employer records in the filings with exactly this name. Each is kept separate: before FY2024 the filings carry no employer tax number, so records are grouped by name and state, and no official identifier shows that these are the same company.
| Record | State | Applications | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chateck, Inc. | Washington | 148 | FY2012–FY2026 |
Among employers in California
Chateck, Inc. has 146 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #1,410 of 30,712 sponsoring employers in California and #8,774 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.01% of the applications filed by employers based in California.
- Rank in California
- 1,410 of 30,712
- Rank in the United States
- 8,774 of 168,030
- Share of California's applications
- 0.01%
- Employers in the same industry group (NAICS 541) in California
- 12,087
- Google LLC100,642
- HCL America, Inc.65,516
- Facebook, Inc.63,530
- Intel Corporation61,185
- Apple Inc.60,673
- Google Inc.34,245
- Cisco Systems, Inc.26,767
- Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.25,216
- UST Global Inc.25,160
- Linkedin Corporation17,398
Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more