VISA ATLASWork visas & talent mobility
From→ToFind a corridor EN
☰

AG Systems Inc

Employer · Texas, United States

Employer address
Texas, United States
Applications on record
300
FY2025 applications
0
FY2026 to 30 June
0
Programmes
LCA
Median offered wage
$50,000
Year by year
Data as at 30 Jun 2026
VE<USAAG<SYSTEMS<INC<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
TX3005<FY20087<FY2026Q32<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<4

Applications year by year

AG Systems Inc appears in 300 applications filed with the U.S. Department of Labor between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2026 (to 30 June).

Applications by fiscal year — AG Systems Inc

126252FY2008FY2010FY2012FY2014FY2016FY2018FY2020FY2022FY2024FY2026*
126252FY2008FY2012FY2016FY2020FY2024FY2026*
Data table
FY2008252
FY200948
FY20100
FY20110
FY20120
FY20130
FY20140
FY20150
FY20160
FY20170
FY20180
FY20190
FY20200
FY20210
FY20220
FY20230
FY20240
FY20250
FY2026*0
Fiscal yearLCA
FY2026*0
FY20250
FY20240
FY20230
FY20220
FY20210
FY20200
FY20190
FY20180
FY20170
FY20160
FY20150
FY20140
FY20130
FY20120
FY20110
FY20100
FY200948
FY2008252
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Where the jobs are

Worksite of each application as filed (first worksite where several are listed).

AG Systems Inc: applications by worksite state

1+1+2+3+4+
1+1+2+3+4+
Data table
StateApplications
TX217
CA53
VA5
IL4
FL3
AR3
OR3
WI3
DC2
NJ2
AZ2
RI1
WA1
PA1
Worksite states
  1. Texas217
  2. California53
  3. Virginia5
  4. Illinois4
  5. Florida3
  6. Arkansas3
  7. Oregon3
  8. Wisconsin3
  9. District of Columbia2
  10. New Jersey2
Worksite cities
  1. Austin, TX212
  2. San Jose, CA31
  3. Fremont, CA5
  4. Mountain View, CA4
  5. Plano, TX4
  6. Beaverton, OR3
  7. Milwaukee, WI3
  8. Sunnyvale, CA3
  9. Little Rock, AR3
  10. Jacksonville, FL3
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

What they hire for and pay

Occupations, job titles and offered wages as stated on the applications.

Job titles on labor condition applications
  1. Computer Programmer231
  2. Computer Systems Analyst33
  3. Computer System Analyst30
  4. Computer Software Engineer3
  5. SAP Finance-controller Sme (fico)1
  6. Computer Systems Analysts1
  7. Computer Engineer1

Offered annual wage, all years, 10th to 90th percentile

Median $50,000; middle half $50,000 to $50,000 · 300 applications.

$40k$45k$50k$55k$60k
$40k$45k$50k$55k$60k
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

H-1B petitions decided by USCIS

Approvals and denials of Form I-129 petitions, by USCIS fiscal year. Linked by employer name, state and the last four digits of the tax ID.

Approved H-1B petitions (initial + continuing)

11FY2009
11FY2009
Data table
FY20091
Fiscal yearInitial approvalsInitial denialsContinuing approvalsContinuing denials
FY200912400
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services — H-1B Employer Data Hub (FY2009–FY2023)Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Among employers in Texas

AG Systems Inc has 300 work visa applications on record (FY2008–FY2026), ranking #521 of 15,820 sponsoring employers in Texas and #4,709 of 168,030 in the United States; that is 0.02% of the applications filed by employers based in Texas.

Rank in Texas
521 of 15,820
Rank in the United States
4,709 of 168,030
Share of Texas's applications
0.02%
Largest sponsoring employers in Texas
  1. Infosys Limited249,552
  2. Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corp158,582
  3. Tech Mahindra (americas),inc.53,212
  4. Tesla, Inc.17,540
  5. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation16,060
  6. KPMG LLP12,376
  7. Oracle America, Inc.10,036
  8. Ericsson Inc.8,088
  9. Dallas Independent School District6,275
  10. AT&T Services, Inc.6,264
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Foreign Labor Certification — disclosure data FY2008–FY2026 Q3Data as at 30 Jun 2026

Official data, not advice. Visa Atlas publishes figures from government registers and statistics. It does not assess eligibility or give immigration advice; for advice, consult a regulated adviser. Read more